Tag Archive for: Peace Bond

R. v. N.H.M. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charges: Assault by choking; break and enter; theft under $5000 and breach of bail x2 (reduced to peace bond).

Issue: Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction and whether it was in the public interest to continue prosecuting the criminal charges.

Result: Mr. Gauthier was able to persuade Crown counsel to enter stays. of proceedings on all criminal charges upon our client agreeing to a peace bond. No jail. No criminal record.

R. v. C.B. – Surrey Provincial Court

Charge: Assault (domestic).

Issue: Given the material Mr. Mines was able to provide to Crown counsel. whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the criminal prosecution.

Result: Our client pleaded not guilty to the criminal aasault charge and, after hearing Mr. Mines’ submission on our client’s behalf, the Court placed our client on a Peace Bond for a period of 12 months. No criminal record.

R. v. K.D. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Mischief Under $5000 (reduced to Peace Bond).

Issue: Given our client’s background and rehabilitative efforts, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade the criminal charge upon our client entering into a 12 month peace bond. No criminal record.

R. v. K.P. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Uttering Threats (reduced to Peace Bond).

Issue: Given the Charter issues that arose during our client’s arrest, whether it was appropriate to continue with the criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Gauthier was able to persuade Crown counsel that police had likely violated our client’s rights during his arrest and to proceed with a Peace Bond rather than the criminal charge. No criminal record.

R. vs. E.M. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charges: Assault x2 (Reduced to Peace Bond).

Issue: Given the potential for self-defence in this case, whether it was appropriate for the criminal prosecution to continue.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to provide information to Crown counsel which resulted in Crown’s decision to proceed with a Peace Bond rather than the criminal charges. No criminal record.

R. vs. R.C. – Surrey Provincial Court

Charge: Criminal Harassment; Breach of a recognizance.

Issue: Whether it was appropriate to resolve this domestic harassment by ending the criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Gauthier was able to persuade Crown counsel to stay the criminal charges upon. our client entering into a Peace Bond for a period of 12 months. No criminal record.

R. vs. E.D. – North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charges: Assault (domestic).

Issue: Given the information we were able to provide to Crown counsel, whether it was appropriate to continue with the criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel to enter a stay of proceedings upon our client being placed on a peace bond. No criminal record.

R. vs. S.S. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Criminal harassment.

Issue: Given the circumstances of the offence, and rehabilitative steps we were able to guide our client through, whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the criminal charge.

Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade Crown to stay the criminal charge upon our client entering into a s. 810 Peace Bond. No criminal record.

R. vs. T.L. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charges: Indecent Act; Mischief (reduced to Peace Bond).

Issue: Whether the Crown could prove that our client intended to commit a criminal offence.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel to enter a stay of proceedings on the the criminal charges upon our client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal record.

R. vs. J.L. – Surrey Provincial Court

Charge: Assault (domestic).

Issue: Given the rehabilitative steps we were able to guide our client through, whether it was in the public interest to continue with the criminal prosecution.

Result: Mr. Johnson was able to persuade Crown counsel to enter a stay of proceedings on the assault charge upon you entering into a s. 810 peace bond. No criminal record.

R. vs. D.P. – Vancouver provincial Court

Charge: Uttering a Threat (reduced to Peace Bond).

Issues: Whether the words uttered were clearly a threat or not.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel that the words were vague. Crown agreed to end the criminal prosecution upon our client entering into a Peace Bond with a “no contact” condition. No criminal record.

R. vs. D.R. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault (domestic).

Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution.

Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown counsel to enter a stay of proceedings on the assault charge. Our client entered into a 12 month Peace Bond. No criminal record.