Entries by admin

The Problems with Vigilantism: No Rules. No Accountability. No Oversight.

Recently, there have been numerous community-based groups of volunteers who have decided to take law enforcement into their own hands. There are several different iterations, but most of them include the word “creep” in their title. Generally, what these groups who they say, want to meet with underage girls for sexual activity. Then they set […]

R. vs E.S. – Kelowna Provincial Court

Charge: Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking (MDMA). Issue: Whether police had breached our client’s Charter rights when they arrested and searched him based solely on a complaint from a “concerned citizen”. Result: Mr. Mines provided Crown Counsel with an outline of his legal arguments and, on the eve of the trial, Crown Counsel entered a […]

R. vs. S.S. – Vancouver Police Investigation

Charge: Fraud Over $5000 (from employer). Issue: Given the civil settlement of this matter, whether it was  in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution. Result: Mr. Johnson was able to achieve a civil settlement on behalf of our client. On this basis the police elected to not proceed with any charge. No criminal record.

R. vs. D.D. – North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Possession of Cocaine. Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the criminal prosecution. Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown into allowing our client into the Alternative Measures Program. Upon completion, the Court dismissed the charge against our client. No criminal record.

R. vs. N.N. – Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Driving While Prohibited. Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with this prosecution which carries a minimum mandatory 12 month driving prohibition. Result: Mr. Johnson persuaded Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser offence of driving without a driver’s license. Our client received a $400 fine and a 4 month driving […]

A.K. vs. Superintendent of British Columbia

Charge: 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition (IRP). Issue: Whether the investigating officer could prove that our client had care or control of the parked vehicle he was found sleeping in. Result: Mr. Johnson was able to successfully persuade the adjudicator that our client was not a “driver” within the Motor Vehicle Act definition. Our client’s […]