RECENT SUCCESSES


H. L.  vs.  Superintendent of Motor Vehicles

Charge: 60 Day Vehicle Impoundment Reveiw.
Issue: Whether it was appropriate for Mr. Mines' client's vehicle to remain impounded by police.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the adjudicator ruled that the vehicle should be returned at no cost to Mr. Mines' client.
 
 

R. vs. C.R.    -  Surrey Provincial Court.

Charge: Impaired Driving; Driving Over .08.
Issue: Whether the Crown had a substantial liklihood of obtaining a criminal conviction.
Result: After making submissions to Crown Counsel, Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to drop the criminal charges upon his client pleading guilty to a lesser offence under the Motor Vehicle Act.
 
 

R. vs. S.A.T.    -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Production of Marijuana; Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking.
Issue: Whether, in the circumstances it was appropriate to sentence Mr. Mines' client to jail.
Result: After haearing Mr. Mines' submissions on his client's behalf, the Court granted his client a Conditional Sentence Order.
 
 

R. vs. J. S.    -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Theft Under $5000.
Issue: Whether Crown could prove the charge.
Result: Crown withdrew the charge prior to trial.
 
 

R. vs. A.C.  -  Surrey Provincial Court

Charge: Sexual Assault.
Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, the Crown would be able to prove the charge.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, Crown withdrew the criminal charge upon Mr. Mines' client entering into a Peace Bond.
 
 

R. vs. R.D.W.  -  Provincial Court of Alberta

Charge: Impaired Driving / Over .08.
Issue: Whether the police officer had legal grounds to demand a breath sample.
Result: Not Guilty. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the trial judge ruled that the officer acted improperly. The breath test results were excuded, and Mr. Mines' client was aquitted on both charges.
 
 

R. vs. R.G.    -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Break and Entering / Uttering a Threat.
Issue: Whether Crown would be able to prove the identity of the persons who unlawfully entered the complainant's home.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, Crown Counsel withdrew the criminal charges upon Mr. Mines' client enering into a "peace bond" to have no contact with the complainant.
 
 

R. vs. T. M.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether it was in the public interest for the matter to proceed as a ciminal charge.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions Crown Counsel withdrew the criminal charge upon Mr. Mines's client entering into a "Peace Bond".
 
 

R. vs. J. P.  -  North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether the Crown could prove the case.
Result: Crown Counsel withdrew the charge.
 
 

R. vs. H. R.M.    -  Richmond Provincial Court

Charge: Uttering a Threat.
Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for the matter to proceed as a criminal charge.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, Crown Counsel withdrew the criminal charge upon Mr. Mines' client entering into a "Peace Bond".
 
 
Page 14 of 20 pages « First  <  12 13 14 15 16 >  Last »

View by date

 

View by Areas of Practice

 

Profile of Michael Mines

Michael Mines, Vancouver Lawyer, was born in Vancouver and was educated at the University of British Columbia. He obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 and a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1992.
Since becoming a member of the Law Society of British Columbia in 1993, Mr. Mines has exclusively practiced criminal law, including part-time Crown Prosecution work.
Go here to read more...
 

Criminal Defence Law Office