RECENT SUCCESSES


R. vs. R.G.    -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Break and Entering / Uttering a Threat.
Issue: Whether Crown would be able to prove the identity of the persons who unlawfully entered the complainant's home.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, Crown Counsel withdrew the criminal charges upon Mr. Mines' client enering into a "peace bond" to have no contact with the complainant.
 
 

R. vs. T. M.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether it was in the public interest for the matter to proceed as a ciminal charge.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions Crown Counsel withdrew the criminal charge upon Mr. Mines's client entering into a "Peace Bond".
 
 

R. vs. J. P.  -  North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether the Crown could prove the case.
Result: Crown Counsel withdrew the charge.
 
 

R. vs. H. R.M.    -  Richmond Provincial Court

Charge: Uttering a Threat.
Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for the matter to proceed as a criminal charge.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, Crown Counsel withdrew the criminal charge upon Mr. Mines' client entering into a "Peace Bond".
 
 

R. vs. B.L.T.  - Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Production of Marijuana; Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking.
Issue: Whether the search warrant was valid.
Result: Not Guilty. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the trial judge agreed that the warrant had been issued on the basis of misleading information. The search warrant was set aside, the evidence of the grow operation was excluded, and Mr. Mines' client was therefore able to avoid conviction and forfeiture of his residence to the Crown.
 
READ THE DECISION (PDF format)
 

R. vs. H.B.M.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Failure to Comply with Probation Order (5 Counts).
Issue: Mr. Mines' client was alleged to have breached no contact orders with his former spouse on 4 occassions. Credibility of the witnesses was in issue.
Result: After considering the evidence and hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the trial judge found Mr. Mines' client not guilty on 4 of the 5 charges. He placed Mr. Mines' client on Probation. (the Crown had originally sought a jail sentence).
 
READ THE DECISION (PDF format)
 

R. vs. M.T.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Create Terrorism Hoax; Public Mischief.
Issue: Whether, in the circumstances of the offence, it would be appropriate for the Court to convict Mr. Mines' client.
Result: After lengthy submissions to Crown Counsel by Mr. Mines, Crown agreed to proceed on the lesser charge of Public Mischief. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a Discharge.
 
 

R. vs. T.G.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault; Mischief.
Issue: Whether Crown Counsel would be able to proceed in the absence of a key witness.
Result: Crown withdrew both charges on the trial date.
 
 

R. vs. H.B.M.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Possession of Cocaine; Possession of a Prohibited Weapon.
Issue: Whether the police search, incidental to an investigative detention, was lawful.
Result: Not Guilty. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions the trial judge ruled that the search was unlawful. He excluded the drug and weapon evidence and dismissed both charges.
 
 

R. vs. G. M.    -    Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
Issue: Whether the Crown had a reasonable likelihood of conviction.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions and considering its position, Crown Counsel withdrew the charge prior to trial.
 
 
Page 14 of 20 pages « First  <  12 13 14 15 16 >  Last »

View by date

 

View by Areas of Practice

 

Profile of Michael Mines

Michael Mines, Vancouver Lawyer, was born in Vancouver and was educated at the University of British Columbia. He obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 and a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1992.
Since becoming a member of the Law Society of British Columbia in 1993, Mr. Mines has exclusively practiced criminal law, including part-time Crown Prosecution work.
Go here to read more...
 

Criminal Defence Law Office