RECENT SUCCESSES


R. vs. S.T.  -  Port Coquitlam Provincial Court

Charge: Impaired Driving/ Over .08.
Issue: Whether the Crown could prove the accuracy of the breath tests.
Result: Criminal charges withdrawn. Mr. Mines persuaded the Crown to proceed on a less serious Motor Vehicle Act charge. His client was fined and received no driving prohibition.
 
 

R. vs. C.B.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault x2
Issue: Whether Mr. Mines' client, an off-duty security guard, was acting in defence of another person.
Result: Charges withdrawn by Crown Counsel after two days of trial. The evidence tended to establish Mr. Mines' argument that his client was protecting another person from assault.
 
 

R. vs. W.J.      Richmond Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether the police had properly obtained witness statements alleging an assault.
Result: After Mr. Mines' consultations and negotiations with police and Crown Counsel, no charge was approved.
 
 

R. vs. M.S. - Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Possession of Cocaine.
Issue: Whether the automobile search of Mr. Mines' client was lawful.
Result: After Mr. Mines' consultations and negotiations with Crown Counsel, no charge was approved.
 
 

R. vs. J.H.T.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Possession of Stolen Property.
Issue: Whether Crown could prove that Mr. Mines' client knew that the property (mountain bike) was stolen.
Result: Charge Withdrawn. Mr. Mines was successful in persuading Crown of his client's explanation, making a trial unnecessary.
 
 

R. vs. P.H.  -  Merritt Provincial Court

Charge: Impaired Driving/ Over .08.
Issue: Whether Crown was aware of its obligation to adduce evidence from a blood alcohol expert, given that the breath tests were taken outside the 2 hour limit.
Result: Charges withdrawn by Crown. Complete stay of proceedings prior to trial.
 
 

R. vs. S.Y.  -  Richmond Provincial Court

Charge: Theft from Employer.
Issue: Whether Mr. Mines' client would receive a conviction for stealing money from her workplace.
Result: Conditional Discharge. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions on his client's behalf, the Judge agreed that, even though this was a breach of trust situation, neither jail, nor even a criminal conviction was warranted.



 
READ THE DECISION (PDF format)
 

R. vs. L.R.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault with a Weapon.
Issue: Whether Mr. Mines' client was acting in self defence when she inflicted wounds to the arms of the complainant and damaged his jacket.
Result: Charges withdrawn by Crown on the trial date.
 
 

C.J.L. vs. Translink et al     -  Vancouver Supreme Court

Charge: Civil Action for an Assault.
Issue: Mr. Mines represented his client in a civil action against a Skytrain Police Officer and Translink for unlawful assault.
Result: Damages awarded to Mr. Mines' client in range of $40,000.00, plus costs. The jury (after a 12 day trial) found Translink and its officer liable for assault.
 
 

R. vs. M.I.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Communicating for Prostitution.
Issue: Whether, in the circumstances of Mr. Mines' client, it was in the public interest to proceed with the charge
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, Crown Counsel withdrew the charge.
 
 
Page 14 of 17 pages « First  <  12 13 14 15 16 >  Last »

View by date

 

View by Areas of Practice

 

Profile of Michael Mines

Michael Mines, Vancouver Lawyer, was born in Vancouver and was educated at the University of British Columbia. He obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 and a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1992.
Since becoming a member of the Law Society of British Columbia in 1993, Mr. Mines has exclusively practiced criminal law, including part-time Crown Prosecution work.
Go here to read more...
 

Criminal Defence Law Office