RECENT SUCCESSES


R. vs. S. R.  -  North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault with a Weapon; Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
Issue: Whether, in thecircumstances, Mr. Mines' client wouuld be sentenced to jail.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser charge of common assault and to make a joint submission for a Conditional Discharge, which was accepted by the court. No criminal coviction. No jail.
 
 

R. vs. E.Z.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the criminal charge.
Result: After considering Mr. Mines' representations on his client's behalf, Crown Counsel entered a Stay of Proceedings. No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. A.B.  -  North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
Issue: Whether Mr. Mines' client would be sentenced to jail.
Result: Crown Counsel was seeking a jail sentence, but Mr. Mines was able to persuade the Crown to make a joint submission for a 4 month Conditional Sentence on a plea to the lesser offence of common assault. The plea was accepted by the court; no jail.
 
 

R. vs. A.R.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether there was a substantial likelihood of conviction.
Result: After considering Mr. Mines' representations, Crown Counsel elected to call no evidence. Charge dismissed. No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. R.S.B.  -  Surrey Provincial Court

Charge: Forcible Entry; Assault with a Weapon (x2).
Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the charges in this domestic violence case.
Result: Given the steps Mr.Mines' client had taken to rehabilitate himself, Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to enter a Stay of Proceedings prio to the trial date. No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. S.S.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Uttering a Threat.
Issue: Whether it was in the public interset to proceed with the criminal charge.
Result: The Crown had originally sought a jail sentence but Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to Stay the Proceedings upon his client entering into a "Peace Bond". No jail. No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. J.C.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether there was a reasonable likelihood of a conviction.
Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' representations on his client's behalf, Crown Counsel entered a Stay of Proceedings. No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. J.Y.  -  Victoria Provincial Court

Charge: Criminal Harrassment; Threatening x2.
Issue: Whether the Crown had a reasonable likelihood of obtaining a conviction.
Result: Mr.Mines' client pleaded not guilty, the Crown called no evidence, and the trial judge found Mr.Mines' client not guilty.The judge dismissed all 3 criminal charges and placed Mr. Mines' client on a common law Peace Bond. No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. G.A.  - North Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Assault.
Issue: Whether there was a reasonable likelihood of conviction.
Result: On the trial date Crown Counsel, after hearing Mr. Mines' representations, agreed to proceed by way of a s. 810 Recognizance ("Peace Bond").
No criminal record.
 
 

R. vs. M.S.  -  Vancouver Provincial Court

Charge: Criminal Harassment
Issue: Whether, given the nature of the alleged harassment and the apparent consent of the complainant, there was a substantial likelihood of conviction.
Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to enter a Stay of Proceedings prior to setting the matter down for trial. No criminal record.
 
 
Page 1 of 6 pages  1 2 3 >  Last »

View by date

 

View by Areas of Practice

 

Profile of Michael Mines

Michael Mines, Vancouver Lawyer, was born in Vancouver and was educated at the University of British Columbia. He obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1983 and a Bachelor of Laws degree in 1992.
Since becoming a member of the Law Society of British Columbia in 1993, Mr. Mines has exclusively practiced criminal law, including part-time Crown Prosecution work.
Go here to read more...
 

Criminal Defence Law Office