Search

Search for:

• April 17, 2012
  R. vs. B.H. - North Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge:Assault Causing Bodily Harm (domestic).
  Issue:Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove bodily harm.
  Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to proceed on the lesser charge of simple assault. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
• April 13, 2012
  R. vs. B.M. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge: Assault.
  Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal charge.
  Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charge upon his client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal conviction.
• April 12, 2012
  R. vs. J.T. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge:Extortion (x4); Uttering Threats.
  Issue:Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.
  Result: After considering Mr. Mansoori-Dara's representations with repect to the credibility of the complainants, Crown counsel entered a stay of proceedings. No criminal record.
• April 12, 2012
  R. vs. R.B. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge: Driving While Prohibited; Failing to Attend Court.
  Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the charges.
  Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser charge of driving without a licence and to stay the FTA charge. No criminal record. No driving prohibition.
• April 2, 2012
  R. vs. A.A. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge: Criminal Harassment.
  Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution.
  Result: The Crown had originally sought a jail sentence, however Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to stay the criminal charge upon his client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal conviction.
• March 28, 2012
  R. vs. L.D. - Richmond Provincial Court
  Charge: Theft Under $5000 (shoplifting).
  Issue: Whether, given the circumstances, it was in the public interset to proceed with a criminal charge.
  Result: Mr. Mines was able to intervene at the earliest stage of the prosecution, He persuaded Crown Counsel to approve no charge in this case. No record
• March 27, 2012
  R. vs. V.T. - Richmond Provincial Court
  Charges: Extortion.
  Issue: Whether the Crown would be able to prove the Extortion offence.
  Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the Extortion charge and to proceed on the lesser offence of criminal harassment. Crown originally sought a significant jail sentence, but agreed to make a joint submission for a conditional discharge. No jail. No conviction.
• March 26, 2012
  R. vs. P.S. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charges: Sex Assault; Assault.
  Issue: Whether Crown would be able to prove that there was no consent given, resulting in a conviction for sex assault.
  Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to stay the sex assault charge and proceed only on the lesser charge of common assault. The Crown originally sought a significant jail sentence, but agreed to a joint submission of one day (less time served) and probation.
• March 9, 2012
  R. vs. J.Z. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge: Breaking and Entering; Possession of Stolen Property.
  Issue: Whether, given the circumstances of this commercial property offence, it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal prosecution.
  Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to allow his client into the Alternative Measures Program. No criminal record.
• February 15, 2012
  R. vs. C.S.F. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge: Theft Over $5000 (from employer).
  Issue: Whether the Court would impose the one year jail sentence the Crown sought in this $100,000 theft from employer case.
  Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a Conditional Sentence Order. No jail.
• February 15, 2012
  R. vs. S.N.K. - Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
  Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to receive a conditional discharge.
  Result: Though the Crown sought a jail sentence due to the degree of injury sustained by the complainant, the Court, after hearing Mr. Mines' submissions on his client's behalf, granted a conditional discharge.
• February 14, 2012
  R. vs. A.A. - North Vancouver Provincial Court
  Charges: Criminal Harrassment; Threatening.
  Issue: Whether the Crown would be able to prove the criminal charges.
  Result: Despite his client having a prior related record, Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charges upon his client entering into a Peace Bond.
• January 31,2012
  R. vs. E.B. - Richmond Provincial Court
  Charge: Assault Police Officer.
  Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a conditional discharge.
  Result: After hearing Mr. Mansoori-Dara's submissions, the court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
• January 25, 2012
  R. vs. V.K. - Richmond Provincial Court
  Charges: Theft Under $5000 (from employer).
  Issue: Whether it was contrary to the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to be granted a conditional discharge.
  Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted a 9 month conditional discharge. No criminal conviction .

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

Name

E-mail Address Please enter a valid e-mail address.

Phone

Brief description of your legal issue

Please verify that you have read the disclaimer. I have read the disclaimer. disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close