Jump to Navigation
Being Accused of a Crime is Incredibly Stressful.  We Understand the stress that any charge brings and will do everything possible to reduce the weight on your shoulders.  At Mines & Company we will explain strategies, answer your questions and present you with options that will provide the best possible outcome for you.

Mines client shares in Missing Women reward money

Mines client shares in Missing Women reward money

Pickton tipster to share in reward

Bill Hiscox was first person to alert police to serial killer

The man who first tipped off police about Robert Pickton more than three years before the serial killer's arrest will share a $100,000 reward with five other people.

Bill Hiscox, who now lives in Victoria, will get $17,500, his lawyer, Michael Mines, confirmed Wednesday after contacting the Vancouver police board.


News Article online access: at The Vancouver Sun


The money was offered in May 1999 for information leading to a conviction in Vancouver's missing women case.

"For Bill, it hasn't been about the money," Mines said. "It's been about having the authorities listen to his story and acknowledge his story."
Mines said the recent report by Deputy Chief Doug LePard on the botched investigation confirms Hiscox's important role in the case.

"The crucial thing is that Bill provided the information in 1998 before there was any reward money," Mines said. "So, hopefully, this will act as some sort of closure for him."
LePard's report confirms that Hiscox called police in July of that year "with second-hand information that Pickton was responsible for the killing of Sarah de Vries at his Coquitlam pig farm, and might be responsible for the rest of the missing women."

Hiscox told the Victoria Times Colonist in a recent interview that he was working for Pickton's P and B Salvage in Surrey at the time and occasionally visited the farm. A woman who cleaned Pickton's trailer told Hiscox she had noticed bags of bloody clothing and women's identification there.

"We sat down one night and [she] told me, 'You know what, Billy, I think that's where all the girls are going, right there.' I said, 'You know what? I've got the same friggin' feeling.' And she says, 'Well, what are we going to do about it?' And I said, 'Well, somebody's going to need to make a ... phone call here, and I guess I'm going to have to do that.' And I did."

Vancouver police and Coquitlam RCMP followed up on the tip over the next months, and interviewed Hiscox a number of different times. Investigators also gathered other evidence pointing at Pickton before the investigation stalled in August 1999 due to jurisdictional disputes, poor management and shoddy analysis of the information, LePard found.

Pickton kept on killing for another 2 1/2 years. LePard said 13 more women went missing in that period, and DNA and other evidence connects 11 of them to Pickton's farm.
Hiscox could not be reached for comment Wednesday. But he said in an interview two weeks ago that nothing about the case makes any sense to him, and that only a public inquiry will get to the bottom of what happened.

"I would like an inquiry, too, to find out why they didn't act on all this information, why they didn't do what they were supposed to do," he said.
As for the reward, Hiscox said it was never about the money. The reward was posted some 10 months after he first came forward with information.
"I had no intentions about having any of this money in the first place," he said. "But now that I'm in the situation I'm in, hey, that would be great. It would give me a new start in life again."

Hiscox declined to go into much detail about his life, other than to say he's struggling to get back on his feet after battles with substance abuse.
"I've been living," he said. "That's all I can say."

The police board did not identify the other five people who will share the reward with Hiscox. The reward consisted of $70,000 from the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor-General and $30,000 from the Vancouver police department.

© Copyright (c) The Vancouver Sun

BY LINDSAY KINES, POSTMEDIA NEWS AUGUST 26, 2010

Recent Successes | Click to View
  • April 17, 2012
    R. vs. B.H. - North Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge:Assault Causing Bodily Harm (domestic).
    Issue:Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove bodily harm.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to proceed on the lesser charge of simple assault. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
  • April 13, 2012
    R. vs. B.M. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault.
    Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal charge.
    Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charge upon his client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal conviction.
  • April 12, 2012
    R. vs. J.T. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge:Extortion (x4); Uttering Threats.
    Issue:Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.
    Result: After considering Mr. Mansoori-Dara's representations with repect to the credibility of the complainants, Crown counsel entered a stay of proceedings. No criminal record.
  • April 12, 2012
    R. vs. R.B. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Driving While Prohibited; Failing to Attend Court.
    Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the charges.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser charge of driving without a licence and to stay the FTA charge. No criminal record. No driving prohibition.
  • April 2, 2012
    R. vs. A.A. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Criminal Harassment.
    Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution.
    Result: The Crown had originally sought a jail sentence, however Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to stay the criminal charge upon his client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal conviction.
  • March 28, 2012
    R. vs. L.D. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charge: Theft Under $5000 (shoplifting).
    Issue: Whether, given the circumstances, it was in the public interset to proceed with a criminal charge.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to intervene at the earliest stage of the prosecution, He persuaded Crown Counsel to approve no charge in this case. No record
  • March 27, 2012
    R. vs. V.T. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charges: Extortion.
    Issue: Whether the Crown would be able to prove the Extortion offence.
    Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the Extortion charge and to proceed on the lesser offence of criminal harassment. Crown originally sought a significant jail sentence, but agreed to make a joint submission for a conditional discharge. No jail. No conviction.
  • March 26, 2012
    R. vs. P.S. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charges: Sex Assault; Assault.
    Issue: Whether Crown would be able to prove that there was no consent given, resulting in a conviction for sex assault.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to stay the sex assault charge and proceed only on the lesser charge of common assault. The Crown originally sought a significant jail sentence, but agreed to a joint submission of one day (less time served) and probation.
  • March 9, 2012
    R. vs. J.Z. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Breaking and Entering; Possession of Stolen Property.
    Issue: Whether, given the circumstances of this commercial property offence, it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal prosecution.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to allow his client into the Alternative Measures Program. No criminal record.
  • February 15, 2012
    R. vs. C.S.F. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Theft Over $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether the Court would impose the one year jail sentence the Crown sought in this $100,000 theft from employer case.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a Conditional Sentence Order. No jail.
  • February 15, 2012
    R. vs. S.N.K. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
    Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to receive a conditional discharge.
    Result: Though the Crown sought a jail sentence due to the degree of injury sustained by the complainant, the Court, after hearing Mr. Mines' submissions on his client's behalf, granted a conditional discharge.
  • February 14, 2012
    R. vs. A.A. - North Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charges: Criminal Harrassment; Threatening.
    Issue: Whether the Crown would be able to prove the criminal charges.
    Result: Despite his client having a prior related record, Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charges upon his client entering into a Peace Bond.
  • January 31,2012
    R. vs. E.B. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault Police Officer.
    Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mansoori-Dara's submissions, the court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
  • January 25, 2012
    R. vs. V.K. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charges: Theft Under $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether it was contrary to the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted a 9 month conditional discharge. No criminal conviction .
Michael Mines - Profile Reza Mansoori-Dara - Profile
Free Initial Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close