Jump to Navigation
Being Accused of a Crime is Incredibly Stressful.  We Understand the stress that any charge brings and will do everything possible to reduce the weight on your shoulders.  At Mines & Company we will explain strategies, answer your questions and present you with options that will provide the best possible outcome for you.

Mines Client receives suspended sentence in Beating death

Mines Client receives suspended sentence in Beating death

Players in fatal swarming sentenced

NORTHSHORE NEWS
By Jane Syed

One young man was placed under house arrest and a second man received a suspended sentence Thursday for their part in a violent swarming that ended in the death of 25-year-old Robbie Araji in Waterfront Park in the summer.



News Article online access: Suspended sentence in Beating death


Chad Baker, 20, of Squamish, was placed under house arrest for three months, followed by one year's probation, while Phillip Wilmarth, 19, of North Vancouver, received a suspended sentence, 12 months' probation and was ordered to obey a curfew for three months for their part in the savage beating of Araji in the early morning hours of June 30. Baker and Wilmarth both pleaded guilty to assault.

According to Crown prosecution information presented on Thursday in North Vancouver provincial court, Baker and Wilmarth were among a crowd of youths who dogpiled on top of Araji and repeatedly beat and kicked him after he was knocked to the ground.

At some point during the attack, Araji was stabbed in the chest. He died a short time later in Lions Gates Hospital.

Prosecuting Crown lawyer Shannon Halyk said while "no one has come forward to say they stabbed Araji," a 16-year-old who was seen brandishing a knife earlier in the altercation pleaded guilty to manslaughter on Wednesday.

According to an autopsy report, Araji died from a single stab wound that penetrated his heart and a lung, said Halyk.

Before he was stabbed, Araji was beaten by the crowd of youths and had his head smashed with a rock.

Judge Doug Moss described the swarming as "a cowardly attack" on a man who was defenceless and lying on the ground.

"For the rest of your lives, you two . . . are going to have to carry (this) with you. . . . The community will know you were the ones who were involved in this incident that resulted in the death of Araji," Moss told Baker and Wilmarth.

Araji's mother Yvonne and fiancee Mounira Zeidan sat in the front row of the courtroom Thursday, occasionally dabbing tears, as Halyk described Araji's last moments.

Wilmarth and Baker's families also attended court, sitting on the opposite side of the courtroom.

Halyk described how the fight in Waterfront Park started just before 1:30 a.m. on

June 30 after a group of up to 60 young people were "partying and drinking in the park" that night.Araji and his friend Peter Stiak were walking past the teens when one of the youths asked them, "What are you looking at?"

A verbal sparring match followed, then one of the teens put his arm around Araji

and sucker-punched him,

said Halyk. At that point, witnesses said Stiak pulled out a crowbar and "swung the crowbar at the youth who had sucker-punched Araji," said Halyk, eventually hitting one of the teens. Another teen who was brandishing a knife began to chase Stiak, at one point lunging at him and threatening to kill him, she said.

When Stiak ran to call the SeaBus security officers a short distance away, the group of angry youths surrounded Araji. One of them, a 14-year-old who has since been charged with aggravated assault, took a large rock or piece of concrete about a foot long and smashed Araji over the head with it, stunning him and knocking him to the ground, said Halyk.

A number of the teens, including Baker and Wilmarth, then dogpiled on top of Araji and started punching and kicking him, said Halyk.

Witnesses described seeing Wilmarth "beating Araji as fast as he could," using both hands, said Halyk. "Another witness said she saw him punch Araji in the face."

Two witnesses described watching Baker line up and kick Araji twice in the head "then kick him again," said Halyk. They also saw Baker kicking Araji in the ribs, back and stomach.

While neither Baker or Wilmarth delivered the fatal assault "they did take the opportunity to beat him," she said.

Wilmarth's lawyer Michael Mines asked the judge to consider a discharge for his client, saying he was remorseful and a criminal record would make it difficult for him to visit his father in the United States.

Wilmarth's punching of Araji only lasted "a number of seconds," said Mines. "He certainly wasn't the leader of that group."

Baker's lawyer Sarah Rauch described Baker as having a severe drug and alcohol problem during the time when the attack took place. When he hung around with Wilmarth, "there was never any question about what they were going to do. They were going to drink heavily, every day and every night," she said.

Rauch said Baker told her "this incident had changed his life." The defence lawyer said her client found it difficult to read the victim impact statement from Araji's mother. "He wants her to know how deeply he feels sorry for the incident," said Rauch.

Rauch said Baker denies kicking Araji in the head, but admits he "snapped" when he saw his cousin get hit by Araji's friend. "He jumped in and kicked him (Araji) four or five times."

Moss ordered Baker not to leave his home during his three months of house arrest except with his parents or to go to a residential drug and alcohol treatment program.

Wilmarth was ordered to obey a curfew from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. seven days a week during the first three months of his suspended sentence. Both men were banned from drinking, having contact with each other and from going to Waterfront Park. They were also ordered not to possess weapons.

Recent Successes | Click to View
  • April 17, 2012
    R. vs. B.H. - North Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge:Assault Causing Bodily Harm (domestic).
    Issue:Whether the evidence was sufficient to prove bodily harm.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to proceed on the lesser charge of simple assault. After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
  • April 13, 2012
    R. vs. B.M. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault.
    Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal charge.
    Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charge upon his client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal conviction.
  • April 12, 2012
    R. vs. J.T. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge:Extortion (x4); Uttering Threats.
    Issue:Whether there was a substantial likelihood of a conviction.
    Result: After considering Mr. Mansoori-Dara's representations with repect to the credibility of the complainants, Crown counsel entered a stay of proceedings. No criminal record.
  • April 12, 2012
    R. vs. R.B. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Driving While Prohibited; Failing to Attend Court.
    Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the charges.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown Counsel to proceed on the lesser charge of driving without a licence and to stay the FTA charge. No criminal record. No driving prohibition.
  • April 2, 2012
    R. vs. A.A. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Criminal Harassment.
    Issue: Whether it was in the public interest to proceed with the prosecution.
    Result: The Crown had originally sought a jail sentence, however Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to stay the criminal charge upon his client entering into a Peace Bond. No criminal conviction.
  • March 28, 2012
    R. vs. L.D. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charge: Theft Under $5000 (shoplifting).
    Issue: Whether, given the circumstances, it was in the public interset to proceed with a criminal charge.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to intervene at the earliest stage of the prosecution, He persuaded Crown Counsel to approve no charge in this case. No record
  • March 27, 2012
    R. vs. V.T. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charges: Extortion.
    Issue: Whether the Crown would be able to prove the Extortion offence.
    Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the Extortion charge and to proceed on the lesser offence of criminal harassment. Crown originally sought a significant jail sentence, but agreed to make a joint submission for a conditional discharge. No jail. No conviction.
  • March 26, 2012
    R. vs. P.S. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charges: Sex Assault; Assault.
    Issue: Whether Crown would be able to prove that there was no consent given, resulting in a conviction for sex assault.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to stay the sex assault charge and proceed only on the lesser charge of common assault. The Crown originally sought a significant jail sentence, but agreed to a joint submission of one day (less time served) and probation.
  • March 9, 2012
    R. vs. J.Z. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Breaking and Entering; Possession of Stolen Property.
    Issue: Whether, given the circumstances of this commercial property offence, it was in the public interest to proceed with a criminal prosecution.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to allow his client into the Alternative Measures Program. No criminal record.
  • February 15, 2012
    R. vs. C.S.F. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Theft Over $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether the Court would impose the one year jail sentence the Crown sought in this $100,000 theft from employer case.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted his client a Conditional Sentence Order. No jail.
  • February 15, 2012
    R. vs. S.N.K. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault Causing Bodily Harm.
    Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to receive a conditional discharge.
    Result: Though the Crown sought a jail sentence due to the degree of injury sustained by the complainant, the Court, after hearing Mr. Mines' submissions on his client's behalf, granted a conditional discharge.
  • February 14, 2012
    R. vs. A.A. - North Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charges: Criminal Harrassment; Threatening.
    Issue: Whether the Crown would be able to prove the criminal charges.
    Result: Despite his client having a prior related record, Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown Counsel to stay the criminal charges upon his client entering into a Peace Bond.
  • January 31,2012
    R. vs. E.B. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault Police Officer.
    Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mansoori-Dara's submissions, the court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
  • January 25, 2012
    R. vs. V.K. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charges: Theft Under $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether it was contrary to the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted a 9 month conditional discharge. No criminal conviction .
Michael Mines - Profile Reza Mansoori-Dara - Profile
Free Initial Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close