Jump to Navigation

Law Firm Handling Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking Charges

Vancouver Drug Charges Defence Lawyers

While drug trafficking charges require actual evidence of a sale, it is sometimes easier for police to charge people with Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking (PPT).

People are charged with PPT, because they are allegedly in possession of a large quantity of drugs. Additional incriminatory evidence might include scales, packaging material, score sheets or cell phones. Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking is a serious offence. The penalties that come with a conviction are virtually the same as those that come with drug trafficking. Crown Counsel almost always seeks a jail sentence.

At Mines & Company, we know how to defend against these serious charges. We have more than 18 years of experience that we will put to work to benefit you.

In one of our recent successes (R. v. G.B. in Vancouver Provincial Court), our client was charged with possession for the purpose of trafficking ecstasy and marijuana. The Crown initially sought jail time. We convinced the crime to reduce the charge to simple possession. The court granted a conditional discharge. No jail time.

Possession for the Purpose of Trafficking or Simple Possession?

What is the difference between simple possession and possession for the purpose of trafficking? This is a question of intent to sell, and intent can be argued. In the eyes of the Crown, a large quantity may be enough to imply that marijuana or another drug is going to be sold, even though the accused intended it for personal use. In these cases, one of our strategies involves negotiating charges down to the much less severe charge of simple drug possession.

Start With a Free Initial Consultation

To schedule a free initial consultation with one of our Vancouver lawyers handling possession for the purpose of trafficking charges, call 877-467-1804 or contact us via e-mail.

Recent Successes | Click to View
  • January 31,2012
    R. vs. E.B. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault Police Officer.
    Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mansoori-Dara's submissions, the court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
  • January 25, 2012
    R. vs. V.K. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charges: Theft Under $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether it was contrary to the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted a 9 month conditional discharge. No criminal conviction .
  • January 24, 2012
    R. vs. G.L. - RCMP Investigation
    Charges: Importing Child Pornography.
    Issue: Whether Mr. Mines' client had knowledge of the material found by customs officers on a computer hard drive that he brought into Canada.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to steer his client through the investigation with no charge being recommended by police.
  • January 5, 2012
    R. vs. B.T. - Port Coquitlam Provincial Court
    Charges: Theft Over $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether jail was the appropriate sentence for this breach of trust case which involved a theft of almost $70,000.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to resolve this case on a single count of theft and to persue a joint submission for a community based sentence. The court granted an 18 month conditional sentence order. No jail.
  • January 3, 2012
    R. vs. H.B. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charges: Assault x2; Unlawful Confinement.
    Issue: Whether the Crown could prove the confinement charge and whether it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a discharge.
    Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown counsel to stay the confinement charge and one of the assault charges. After hearing Mr. Manoori-Dara's submissions,the Court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
Michael Mines - Profile Reza Mansoori-Dara - Profile
Free Initial Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close