Jump to Navigation

Law Firm Defending Against Threatening Charges

Vancouver Criminal Defence Lawyers

At Mines & Company, we defend clients who are charged with offences that involve uttering threats. Where there is a pattern of threatening or other harassing behaviour, people can be charged with criminal harassment.

With more than 18 years of experience and backgrounds that include Crown prosecution work, we understand the law in these cases. We understand that people often do not mean what they say and that behaviour can be misunderstood. Importantly, we know that the Crown has the burden of proving that the alleged threat or behaviour, in the circumstances, was intended to cause fear. We will examine the circumstances of your case and provide you with options.

In one of our recent successes (R. v. S.S. in Vancouver Provincial Court), our client was charged with uttering a threat. Initially, Crown Counsel wanted our client to be sentenced to jail. We persuaded Crown Counsel to stay the proceedings in exchange for our client entering into a peace bond. No jail. No criminal record.

Uttering a Threat

Generally, a person charged with a threatening offence is released from police custody on their promise to not have contact with the complainant (the person who was threatened). Often, the complainant is a friend or relative who, on reflection, does not want the no contact condition. We can assist in getting no contact or no go conditions removed. We will examine the circumstances of your case and, wherever appropriate, we will endeavour to persuade Crown Counsel to not proceed with criminal charges.

Start With a Free Initial Consultation

To schedule a free initial consultation with a Vancouver criminal lawyer about a charge of uttering a threat or of criminal harassment, call us at 877-467-1804 or contact us via e-mail.

Recent Successes | Click to View
  • January 31,2012
    R. vs. E.B. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charge: Assault Police Officer.
    Issue: Whether, in the circumstances, it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mansoori-Dara's submissions, the court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
  • January 25, 2012
    R. vs. V.K. - Richmond Provincial Court
    Charges: Theft Under $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether it was contrary to the public interest for Mr. Mines' client to be granted a conditional discharge.
    Result: After hearing Mr. Mines' submissions, the Court granted a 9 month conditional discharge. No criminal conviction .
  • January 24, 2012
    R. vs. G.L. - RCMP Investigation
    Charges: Importing Child Pornography.
    Issue: Whether Mr. Mines' client had knowledge of the material found by customs officers on a computer hard drive that he brought into Canada.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to steer his client through the investigation with no charge being recommended by police.
  • January 5, 2012
    R. vs. B.T. - Port Coquitlam Provincial Court
    Charges: Theft Over $5000 (from employer).
    Issue: Whether jail was the appropriate sentence for this breach of trust case which involved a theft of almost $70,000.
    Result: Mr. Mines was able to persuade Crown to resolve this case on a single count of theft and to persue a joint submission for a community based sentence. The court granted an 18 month conditional sentence order. No jail.
  • January 3, 2012
    R. vs. H.B. - Vancouver Provincial Court
    Charges: Assault x2; Unlawful Confinement.
    Issue: Whether the Crown could prove the confinement charge and whether it was in the public interest for Mr. Mansoori-Dara's client to be granted a discharge.
    Result: Mr. Mansoori-Dara was able to persuade Crown counsel to stay the confinement charge and one of the assault charges. After hearing Mr. Manoori-Dara's submissions,the Court granted his client a conditional discharge. No conviction.
Michael Mines - Profile Reza Mansoori-Dara - Profile
Free Initial Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an lawyer-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close